Does ‘Safer Storage’ Reduce Agricultural Pesticide Self-poisoning in Rural Asia? Professor Flemming Konradsen & Professor Michael Eddleston
Original Article Reference
This SciPod is a summary of the paper ‘Effectiveness of household lockable pesticide storage to reduce pesticide self-poisoning in rural Asia: a community-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial’, from The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31961-X
Share Episode
About this episode
Attempting suicide by ingesting pesticides is a major public health problem in rural Asia. In Sri Lanka, pesticide self-poisoning is the most common method used in suicide attempts in many rural areas. Globally, it accounts for as many as one in every five of the world’s suicides. Many people have recommended ‘safer storage and use’ as the answer to the problem. A group of Sri Lankan and international researchers took on the challenge to test, on a large scale, whether improving pesticide storage in households would actually reduce the frequency of self-poisoning with pesticides. Remarkably, they found no benefit from this approach at all. These findings have important implications for global policies aiming to reduce the incidence of suicide and self-harm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Related episodes
Prof. Elizabeth Regan | The Healthcare Revolution That Technology Alone Cannot Deliver
Imagine a patient with several health problems moving through a modern medical system. She may see a family doctor, a specialist, a hospital team, a pharmacist and perhaps a community service. Each professional may be highly skilled. Each organisation may own sophisticated software. Yet the patient can still find herself repeating the same story, carrying information between appointments, waiting for records to arrive and trying to understand who is responsible for what. The individual parts work well, but the journey doesn’t.
Dr Sarah Davies – Dr Clare French | The Vaccine Uptake Recipe: Which Ingredients Work for Different Groups?
Vaccines can prevent serious illness, disability and death, but their benefits depend on people actually receiving them. When vaccination rates fall, the usual question is how to support more people to get vaccinated. Yet that question may be too simple. A reminder, a conversation, a financial incentive or a more convenient clinic can all help, but they do not necessarily help everyone in the same way. That is the central insight emerging from a major analysis led by Dr Sarah Davies and Dr Clare French, both of the University of Bristol, and colleagues. To go beyond asking whether broad categories such as “education” or “improved access” work, the researchers took apart vaccine uptake interventions to examine their individual ingredients. It is a little like studying recipes: knowing that a cake tastes good is useful, but knowing which ingredients make the difference is far more helpful if you want to create a better cake.
Prof. Toine Pieters | The Depression Spiral: Rethinking an Illness That Refuses to Stand Still
What if depression is best understood as a process that gathers momentum, rather than a fixed illness that simply appears once enough symptoms have accumulated? A difficult week becomes persistent stress. Persistent stress demands more coping. Coping becomes exhausting. Sleep, appetite, activity and relationships begin to change. Those changes can then create fresh stress, pushing a person further down a self-reinforcing spiral.
Dr. Linda Mermelstein | When Knowledge Is Not Enough: Building Trust Around Prostate Cancer
For many men, a conversation about prostate cancer begins long before they enter a doctor’s office. It may begin when a brother mentions a test, when a friend describes a frightening diagnosis, or when a family member dies from cancer. For Black men, those conversations carry particular urgency. Prostate cancer affects them much more often, yet knowing that a disease is dangerous does not automatically mean people have the information, confidence, or trusted relationships needed to make decisions about screening.
Increase the impact of your research
• Good science communication encourages everyday people to be scientifically literate so that they can analyse the integrity and legitimacy of information.
• Good science communication encourages people into STEM-related fields of study and employment.
• Good public science communication fosters a community around research that includes both members of the public, policymakers and scientists.
• In a recent survey, 75% of people suggested they would prefer to listen to an interesting story than read it.
Step 1 Upload your science paper
Step 2 SciPod script written
Step 3 Voice audio recorded
Step 4 SciPod published



