The Health-e Babies App for Socially Disadvantaged Women: Embracing Technology to Improve Health Literacy

Nov 7, 2019 | biology, engineering and tech, health and medicine, social and behavioural sciences

Original Article Reference

This SciPod is a summary of the paper ‘The Health-e Babies Appfor antenatal education: Feasibility for socially disadvantaged women’ from PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194337

About this episode

Over the past few years, there has been an explosion in the number of applications – more commonly known as apps – that can be used on mobile phones. Vicki Clifton, Julia Dalton, Dianne Rodger, Michael Wilmore, Andrew Skuse, Sal Humphreys, and Margarita Flabouris, based at the Mater Research Institute and the University of Adelaide have developed Health-e Babies, a new pregnancy app for expecting mothers from socially disadvantaged backgrounds. Their work provides important insights into overcoming the challenges associated with providing information using new technologies to groups most in need of health education.
 

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicenseCreative Commons License

What does this mean?

Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium

or format

Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any

purpose, even commercially.

Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the

license, and indicate if changes were made.

Related episodes

Dr John Kershner | Understanding the Causes and Brain Mechanisms Behind Dyslexia

Dr John Kershner | Understanding the Causes and Brain Mechanisms Behind Dyslexia

Individuals with dyslexia encounter difficulties in learning to read, despite possessing a normal level of intelligence and having access to qualified teachers and educational materials. However, the causes of dyslexia remain disputed. One suggestion is that dyslexia may be related to stress, either experienced by the afflicted individual at a young age, or through inheriting stress-related biological changes from their parents. Dr John Kershner, a neuropsychologist at the University of Toronto, has conducted extensive research on this alternative hypothesis and provides compelling evidence to support this emerging concept.

Dr. Matthew Sherrer | An Infinite Game Mindset for Enhanced Cooperation in Anesthesia

Dr. Matthew Sherrer | An Infinite Game Mindset for Enhanced Cooperation in Anesthesia

Anesthesia in the US is currently delivered through a team-based approach, with physician anesthesiologists supervising certified registered nurse anesthetists. However, in over 20 states, there is no requirement for nurse anesthetists to be supervised by anesthesiologists, allowing them to work independently. This has resulted in a bitter turf war over the rights and responsibilities of physicians and advanced practice nurses working in this discipline to provide patient care, paving the way for daily acrimony and a toxic working environment. The mindset behind this adversarial approach can be compared with a “finite game”, where there are clear winners and losers. Aiming to challenge this dysfunctional tribalism, Dr. Matthew Sherrer from the University of Alabama Birmingham and colleagues have drawn on an alternative mindset: the infinite game.

Professor Pei Wang | Defining AI to Ensure Effective Research and Policymaking

Professor Pei Wang | Defining AI to Ensure Effective Research and Policymaking

Artificial intelligence – or AI – is receiving increasing attention for its rapid development and potential to change society. Researchers are working hard to develop its capabilities, while regulators are racing to ensure it is managed and governed properly. But what do we mean by AI, and how can we define such a complex term? In a recent paper, Professor Pei Wang at Temple University argues that the lack of an agreed definition makes it difficult for policymakers to assess what AI will be capable of in the near future, or even which kinds of AI are desirable. To combat this, he discusses what makes a robust definition, and suggests his own.

Increase the impact of your research

• Good science communication helps people make informed decisions and motivates them to take appropriate and affirmative action.

• Good science communication encourages everyday people to be scientifically literate so that they can analyse the integrity and legitimacy of information.

• Good science communication encourages people into STEM-related fields of study and employment.

• Good public science communication fosters a community around research that includes both members of the public, policymakers and scientists.

• In a recent survey, 75% of people suggested they would prefer to listen to an interesting story than read it.

Step 1

Upload your science paper

Step 2

SciPod script written

Step 3

Voice audio recorded

Step 4

SciPod published