Strategies and Tools for Studying Microglial-Mediated Synapse Elimination and Refinement
Original Article Reference
This SciPod is a summary of the paper ‘Strategies and Tools for Studying Microglial-Mediated Synapse Elimination and Refinement’
Authored by ‘Raffaella Morini, Matteo Bizzotto, Fabio Perrucci, Fabia Filipello and Michela Matteoli’
Published in the open access journal Frontiers in Immunology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.640937
About this episode
Synapse elimination is a tightly regulated process, and an aberrant number of synapses both during the early stages of development or later in aging, has been observed in several neurological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia or autism. Effective methodological approaches for investigating how supernumerary synapses and apoptotic material are removed from the brain are vital for understanding the underlying mechanisms, and this, in turn, may provide exciting avenues for the development of new treatments. Dr Morini, Dr Filipello and colleagues at Humanitas University and at Washington University in St Louis have recently published a review about the different strategies and tools available to study the role of microglia, the phagocytes of the brain, in neuronal and synaptic substrates phagocytosis.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More episodes
Prof. Elizabeth Regan | The Healthcare Revolution That Technology Alone Cannot Deliver
Imagine a patient with several health problems moving through a modern medical system. She may see a family doctor, a specialist, a hospital team, a pharmacist and perhaps a community service. Each professional may be highly skilled. Each organisation may own sophisticated software. Yet the patient can still find herself repeating the same story, carrying information between appointments, waiting for records to arrive and trying to understand who is responsible for what. The individual parts work well, but the journey doesn’t.
Dr Sarah Davies – Dr Clare French | The Vaccine Uptake Recipe: Which Ingredients Work for Different Groups?
Vaccines can prevent serious illness, disability and death, but their benefits depend on people actually receiving them. When vaccination rates fall, the usual question is how to support more people to get vaccinated. Yet that question may be too simple. A reminder, a conversation, a financial incentive or a more convenient clinic can all help, but they do not necessarily help everyone in the same way. That is the central insight emerging from a major analysis led by Dr Sarah Davies and Dr Clare French, both of the University of Bristol, and colleagues. To go beyond asking whether broad categories such as “education” or “improved access” work, the researchers took apart vaccine uptake interventions to examine their individual ingredients. It is a little like studying recipes: knowing that a cake tastes good is useful, but knowing which ingredients make the difference is far more helpful if you want to create a better cake.
Prof. Toine Pieters | The Depression Spiral: Rethinking an Illness That Refuses to Stand Still
What if depression is best understood as a process that gathers momentum, rather than a fixed illness that simply appears once enough symptoms have accumulated? A difficult week becomes persistent stress. Persistent stress demands more coping. Coping becomes exhausting. Sleep, appetite, activity and relationships begin to change. Those changes can then create fresh stress, pushing a person further down a self-reinforcing spiral.
Dr. Linda Mermelstein | When Knowledge Is Not Enough: Building Trust Around Prostate Cancer
For many men, a conversation about prostate cancer begins long before they enter a doctor’s office. It may begin when a brother mentions a test, when a friend describes a frightening diagnosis, or when a family member dies from cancer. For Black men, those conversations carry particular urgency. Prostate cancer affects them much more often, yet knowing that a disease is dangerous does not automatically mean people have the information, confidence, or trusted relationships needed to make decisions about screening.
Increase the impact of your research
• Good science communication helps people make informed decisions and motivates them to take appropriate and affirmative action.
• Good science communication encourages everyday people to be scientifically literate so that they can analyse the integrity and legitimacy of information.
• Good science communication encourages people into STEM-related fields of study and employment.
• Good public science communication fosters a community around research that includes both members of the public, policymakers and scientists.
• In a recent survey, 75% of people suggested they would prefer to listen to an interesting story than read it.
Step 1 Upload your science paper
Step 2 SciPod script written
Step 3 Voice audio recorded
Step 4 SciPod published



